Nawas Sharif
With the elections over and a new government in place, Pakistan
will have to make several important choices in the international arena. A great
deal has changed since the last time Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif occupied the office he won back
after 14 years. More will change in the months and years ahead. Some
of this will be the result of what Pakistan has done to itself over the last
decade and a half. Some will happen because of the developments outside
Pakistan’s control.
From Pakistan’s perspective,
perhaps the most significant development is the lack of respect for the country
in the western world. Several surveys carried out by western think tanks and
agencies rate the country as one of the least liked in the world. The BBC, for instance, surveyed
more than 26,000 people around the world to rate their perception of 16
countries and found that Pakistan was seen positively by
only 15 per cent of the respondents. Such a low opinion in
democracies influences the making of public policy. Pakistan is now in a
difficult world in which it has lost respect.
It was a relatively simple world the last time Prime Minister
Sharif was in power. It was dominated by one superpower, the United States.
Bill Clinton, America’s supremely confident president, governed an equally
supremely confident nation. The Soviet Union had collapsed eight years earlier
under the weight of its unworkable economic system. In the final year of
Nawaz’s second tenure as prime minister, President Clinton had used his
enormous influence to negotiate peace between India and Pakistan. The two
countries were about to go to war over the failed Kargil adventure undertaken
by General (retd) Pervez Musharraf. India had responded with resolve and
firmness the general had not expected. The two countries were close to an
all-out war when Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif requested President Clinton for
help. The American president, sensing the danger in an open conflict between
two nations armed with nuclear weapons, worked out a solution that saved
Pakistan’s face while Islamabad accepted all the demands made by India. These
included total withdrawal from Kargil.
In 1999, Afghanistan seemed more settled than it had been for
more than a decade. The Taliban, having overcome the resistance offered to
their advance by all but one warlord that had fought the Soviet Union in
1979-89, had brought peace to the country. They ruled the Afghan nation with an
iron hand, imposing on it what they believed to be the Islamic way of
governance. The regime was recognised by three Muslim countries — Pakistan,
Saudi Arabia and the UAE — but was shunned by the rest of the world.
Fourteen years later, in 2013, the third-time prime minister
looks at a very different world. Since 1999, the confidence with which
Washington dealt with the world is mostly gone. A deep recession in 2007-09 and
disagreement in the country about the role of the state have affected the
American mood and increased the citizenry’s worry about its future. Since 1999,
the United States has been involved in two long wars, both in the Muslim world.
It pulled out of Iraq in 2012 and is getting ready to leave Afghanistan. In
both countries, a lot of blood was shed and trillions of dollars were spent but
what will be left is chaos. These two wars have drained energy out of America
and left it weak. Across the Atlantic, the European Union is faced with the
deepest economic crisis since its creation. And Japan has been in throes of a
recession that has proven to be exceptionally stubborn. As opposed to the old
industrial nations, several Asian countries continue to see their economies
expand.
China now poses a serious challenge to America’s domination. The
most important change from Pakistan’s perspective is the rise of China. It now
has the second largest economy in the world, having passed Japan in 2010. It
has become the world’s leading exporter; it also surpassed the United States as
the world’s biggest trading nation in 2012. India has seen its economy grow at
a rate almost three times the average for Pakistan in the last 14 years.
Islamabad can no longer look at New Delhi as a near-equal. India has a much
larger economy and much stronger military than was the case in 1999. The Muslim
world has also changed significantly since the last time Nawaz Sharif occupied
the prime minister’s office. The Arab spring of 2011 has felled three
long-enduring regimes that had been in power for more than 127 years combined.
Regimes changed in Tunisia, Egypt and Yemen as a result of the pressure exerted
by the Arab street. There is civil war in the fourth Arab state, Syria. The
continuing conflict in Syria threatens to pit the Sunni states against those in
which the Shias are in majority. Pakistan, with the world’s second largest Shia
population, will have to worry about the possibility of this development.
While Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has said that solving the
country’s energy crisis must be his top priority, he cannot ignore the world
outside his country’s borders. He must understand the shape the world has taken
since the last time he held the reins of power and also the change that is
likely to occur in the future.
No comments:
Post a Comment